Freedom is a constant state of fluid. Dynamic. Yet, not tangible— though it is possible to translate into tangibility.
:: The sense of self likewise is fluid. The stem of freedom.

To possess self, one must possess will. The self defines the boundaries of personal freedom— limits: translating into tangibility. Therefore, the self wills to define freedom.
:: Hence, will dictates freedom.

:: Then, does will not limit freedom?
Is will a construct blocking the ability to embrace the limitless potential in the pursuit of oneself?
>>Willing & succeeding in defining limits → restricting the self → limiting freedom → collapsing in action; paralysis due to its vastness.
:: Therefore, is freedom the offspring of will or does it define it?