It is fundamentally impossible to be superior to others in intuition. Ones intuition, fossilized by consciousness, cannot equate to a higher standing.
:: Most of what has happened to an individual is probabilistic and deterministic: a string of events leading to supposed "revelations" in life.

:: These "revelations" could be considered to be interconnected points— a network of data. One merely chooses pathways to reach this fixed "point".
>>Hence, arriving to a point in this network earlier than others is not to be considered as an achievement in intuition.

Such pathways are consequences of preceding experiences, further shaping an individuals perception (intuition, too) of the world. Therefore, in relation, intuition is rather a reaction to ones environment. Considering these "environments" in its fundamentals are deterministic: reflecting on ones environment (intuitively, ) as a consequence of a specific environment, might be considered a deterministic probability for choosing one pathway over the other. By itself, this action isn't novel.
:: Hence, an action like this only facilitates reaching one singular intuitive point "faster" relatively— yet the consequences are always the same.
>>Environment → reaction → gained intuition/experience (a process)

In this relation, the universe in its vast expanse, since shaped by a collective human experience (to us), could also be considered probabilistic— absurd in definition?
>>This is not nihilism. To be conscient— one should live to define things in relation to it, "create meaning". Humanity is found in process.